Here's a blurb from Doug Wilson's blog (full text here) about the common FV usage of the word "baptistic" in referring to Reformed folks with less than Reformed sacramentologies:
Actually, baptistic is not a taunt at all when referring to Baptists. Nor is being Lutheran a problem when your synod is Missouri. The problem in this debate is with baptists who think they are presbyterians. But even that could go without comment (and did for decades), but then one day the bapto-presbyterians up and launched an attack against the historic presbyterians for being crypto-papists. Things went downhill after that.
I don't know whether to laugh or cry. To laugh because it is quite true and to cry, well, for the same reason.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
.jpg)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment